2025 年,一颗一克拉的培育钻石在美国零售端跌到 300 到 500 美元,而在柜台隔壁,同样大小、成色相近的天然钻石仍挂着 6000 美元以上的标价。十年前,这两者几乎没有价差;如今,一道十倍以上的鸿沟横在中间,把"钻石"这个词硬生生劈成了两个市场。这道鸿沟不是行情波动,而是一个行业的定价逻辑正在被重写——而当材料本身不再稀缺,品牌真正能自由定价的,只剩下设计、故事与呈现。
先把数字说清。据贝恩《全球钻石行业报告》与行业智库估算,培育钻石在全球钻石珠宝零售中的占比,已从 2018 年的不足 2%,攀升到 2024 年的约 11%—14%;在北美订婚戒指市场,这一比例更高。价格曲线的下滑更陡:一克拉圆形培育钻石的批发价,从 2016 年每克拉约 4000 美元,跌到 2024 年不足 500 美元,降幅超过九成。同期天然钻石经历价格回调,上游毛坯报价下调,但终端零售维持高位,价差因此被进一步拉大。国内市场同样在跟进——周大生、曼卡龙等本土品牌陆续上架培育钻产品线,把客群从婚嫁扩展到日常悦己。
供给端的聚集同样剧烈。中国河南一个省份贡献了全球约一半的培育钻石毛坯产能,HPHT 与 CVD 两条技术路线同时成熟,把"种"一颗钻石的周期从数月压缩到数周;成本曲线的下探,使培育钻得以进入原先由天然钻把持的轻奢价格带。IGI、GIA 等机构早已为培育钻石出具分级证书,鉴定维度与天然钻一致,"是不是真钻"的质疑,在证书面前基本消散,剩下的只是消费者愿不愿意为"地球孕育"支付溢价。
品牌端的分化已经上演。潘多拉在 2022 年全面转向培育钻石,把它做成可及的时尚符号;Signet、James Allen 等零售商把培育钻列入主力货盘;就连向来坚守天然的戴比尔斯,也曾用 Lightbox 试水。据业内测算,培育钻零售均价已降至天然钻的十分之一到五分之一,价格透明让"按克拉溢价"的话术失效。一个清晰的叙事正在形成:天然钻讲稀缺与传承,培育钻讲设计、可持续与价格透明——两者不再正面抢同一批客人,而是把市场切成两层。
从可持续叙事看,培育钻石天然带着"碳足迹更低、不涉及采矿"的标签,更容易进入欧美年轻客群的礼赠清单;一项 2025 年的欧美消费者调研显示,18—34 岁群体中超过六成把"可持续"列为选购珠宝的考量项,这与培育钻的主力客群高度重合。但争议同样存在——"价值保值"的话语权仍握在天然钻一边,二手流通与回收体系也远未对称。消费者用钱包投出的票很现实:要日常佩戴的设计感,选培育;要传家的稀缺性,选天然。两种需求都被尊重,市场因此变厚而非变窄。
真正值得包装从业者注意的,是第三层变化。当钻石的材料价值被价格透明化、被规模生产抹平,消费者记住一件首饰的理由,就越来越依赖开箱那一刻的仪式感、盒体的质感,以及柜台里那束打在首饰上的光。我们接触的金饰与钻石客户里,走年轻化、设计驱动路线的品牌,对首饰盒与陈列道具的要求明显更高:内衬要托住主石、盒型要经得起反复开合、连开盒的阻尼感都被写进需求清单。换句话说,材料越"平权",呈现越值钱——这恰是包装从成本项变成品牌资产的分界点。这也是骏依美包装近年把珠宝盒定制、珠宝包装设计与首饰盒工厂能力持续前置的原因:当呈现变成差异化主战场,包装设计不再是收尾工序,而是产品定义的一部分。
展望 2026,培育钻石的渗透大概率继续上探,但价格快速下行的阶段可能接近尾声,竞争焦点会从"更便宜"转向"更会讲设计"。对整条产业链而言,这未必是坏事:当稀缺不再是唯一卖点,愿意把珠宝包装设计与门店陈列当成产品一部分的品牌,才真正拿到了自己的定价权。
本文为原创内容,版权归骏依美所有,如需转载请注明出处。
骏依美——让每一件珠宝首饰,都被更好地呈现与爱戴。一站式解决首饰包装
In 2025 a one-carat lab-grown diamond sells at US retail for $300-500, while a similar natural stone still carries a $6,000-plus tag. A decade ago they barely differed in price; today a tenfold gap splits "diamond" into two markets. When material is no longer scarce, a brand prices only design, story and presentation.
By Bain's Global Diamond Report, lab-grown's share of diamond jewelry retail rose from under 2% in 2018 to roughly 11%-14% in 2024. Wholesale for a one-carat round fell from about $4,000 per carat in 2016 to under $500 in 2024 — over 90%. Natural diamonds corrected upstream yet held retail high, widening the gap.
Supply concentrated fast. Henan, China supplies about half the world's lab-grown rough; HPHT and CVD both matured. IGI and GIA grade lab-grown on the same dimensions as natural, dissolving most "is it real" doubt — leaving only whether shoppers pay extra for "earth-mined."
Brands diverged. Pandora went fully lab-grown in 2022. The narrative: natural sells scarcity and heritage, lab-grown sells design and transparency.
Sustainability helps — lower footprint, no mining — but "holds value" still sits with natural, and resale systems are asymmetric. Shoppers vote plainly: lab-grown for everyday design, natural for heirloom scarcity.
The shift that matters to packaging: as a stone's value is flattened by pricing and scale, what a customer remembers is the unboxing ritual, the box's weight, the light on the piece. Design-led younger brands now demand more of the box. The more "equal" the material, the more the presentation is worth: packaging moves from cost to asset.
Into 2026, penetration will likely keep climbing; competition shifts from "cheaper" to "better design." When scarcity is no longer the only pitch, brands that treat packaging and display as part of the product finally hold their own pricing power.
This is original content. Copyright belongs to Junyimei.
Junyimei — present every jewel and timepiece at its best.